SARA NEJAD DESIGN

View Original

Aromata-supporting material


Freeze-Dried Cell-Free Biosynthesis

Cell-Free(CF) Bio-production

Fig. 1. Components of a cell-free protein synthesis reaction: (extract, supplements, and a DNA template) with the key reactions that occur when they are combined.

Melinek et al., “Toward a Roadmap for Cell-Free Synthesis in Bioprocessing.”

Freeze-Dried Cell-Free(FD-CR) reactions

Fig. 2. BioBitsTM kits: Freeze-dried educational kits. (A) FD-CF demonstrations require only the addition of water to the supplied reactions and incubation for 1 to 20 hours at 25° to 37°C for observation and analysis by students. In contrast, traditional biology experiments require substantial time, resources, and specialized equipment. (B) With the DNA template and any substrate molecules provided with the FD-CF reaction, the students just have to add water to run a number of bioscience activities and demonstrations.

Huang et al., “BioBitsTM Explorer.”

FD-CF Expression of Aroma Compounds

Fig. 3. Fragrance-generating enzymes as olfactory outputs. (A) Using FD-CF reactions, we manufactured enzymes that can generate various smells from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae acetyltransferase ATF1. (B) Production of fragrance molecules after substrate addition to overnight FD-CF reactions of ATF1, as detected by headspace GC-MS. Values represent averages, and error bars represent SDs of n = 3 biological replicates.

Huang et al., “BioBitsTM Explorer.”


Microfluidic Bioreactor

Cell-Free Microfluidic Bioreactor

Figure. 4.Serpentine channel microfluidic bioreactor design for cell-free production of biotherapeutics.

Abeille et al., “Continuous Microcarrier-Based Cell Culture in a Benchtop Microfluidic Bioreactor.”

Microfluidic Bioreactor

Fig. 5.A 3D-printed microfluidic bioreactor for organ-on-chip cell culture.

Image credit: Ikram Khan


Wearable Olfactory CHI

miniaturized aroma release unit

Fig. 6. Modular scent delivery holders, A) one-piece structure, and B) multi-part decorative structure. C) Design explorations of the scent release mechanism based on 1) Angle between the piezo and the tube. 2) Length and shape of the tube, 3) Assembly of multiple scent release, 4) Clip-on accessories or embeddings in jewelry and piercings.

Wang, Amores, and Maes, “On-Face Olfactory Interfaces.”

Olfactory Interface Placements

Fig. 7. Prototypes that we used for the user study. 1) "Glasses" prototype, 2) "Nose" prototype, and 3) Olfactory necklace. Participants wear the PCB board and battery on their left ear for both on-face designs while hooking the holder at the back part of the cloth for the necklace.

Wang, Amores, and Maes, “On-Face Olfactory Interfaces.”

User Experience Results

Fig. 8. Likert Scale for 1 = Extremely Inappropriate or Extremely Uncomfortable and 9 = Extremely Appropriate or Extremely Comfort- able. Error bars correspond to ±1 S.D.

Wang, Amores, and Maes, “On-Face Olfactory Interfaces.”

Fig. 9. "Moist" - humidity felt on the face, "Smell" - intensity of the smell, "Burst" - visual spray, "Sound" - emitted when a burst is released. Error bars correspond to ±1 S.D. The wearers smelled the fragrance significantly more than the observers for all the prototypes

Wang, Amores, and Maes, “On-Face Olfactory Interfaces.”